Updated March 28 at 10:39am

Hospital beds, health planning and controlling costs

Guest Column:
Ted Almon
In business, many major projects begin with a needs assessment. Since becoming involved with health care reform years ago and helping to form the grassroots reform group today known as HealthRIght, I have long advocated such a planning process for our health care system. More

To continue reading this article, please do one of the following.



Sign up to receive Providence Business News' newsletters
and breaking news alerts.  

OP-ED/LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Hospital beds, health planning and controlling costs

Posted:

In business, many major projects begin with a needs assessment. Since becoming involved with health care reform years ago and helping to form the grassroots reform group today known as HealthRIght, I have long advocated such a planning process for our health care system.

I can happily report we have made some progress in convincing our state’s leaders of the importance of a highly organized and informed planning process toward re-engineering Rhode Island’s health care infrastructure to be more efficient, more effective and less costly.

Coordinated health planning was passed by the General Assembly several years ago and finally received at least nominal funding at the outset of the Chafee administration. Now, with the release of the hospital-bed assessment by the Lewin Group, we are starting to see results, admittedly sketchy, of that effort.

With the report, Lewin has provided a rather broad-stroke overview of the state’s system of hospitals, the single-most-costly element of our provider infrastructure.

Already some in the media are excitedly drawing conclusions from the report which are not explicitly stated, namely that the state may have several hundred “extra” hospital beds and perhaps even one excess facility. Before leaping to a conclusion, however, a more reasoned analysis of the findings would seem to be in order.

With regulators in the R.I. Department of Health and the attorney general’s office facing imminent decisions about changes in control of a number of the state’s hospitals, I think we need to get this right. Such decisions, once made, will not be easily corrected, and the costs and results will be with us for a long time.

The report itself acknowledges that there is no recognized standard for how many hospital beds are needed to support a given population. It depends on myriad variables and begs the question of how much “excess capacity” should be maintained for seasonal fluctuations and/or emergency or disaster situations. Should we decide to bear these risks and lean down the hospital network, it is still rather uncertain how much would be saved. Most hospital insiders concede that simply reducing bed capacity across the entire system would decrease costs only marginally. If an entire facility could be eliminated, how would we choose which one?

There will be those who suggest that market forces should be the only proper way for the system to evolve. If that opinion prevails, we will essentially have a natural selection process as crude and disorderly as any in nature. Like shipwreck survivors on an island with insufficient food and water for all, the fiscally fittest will eventually outlast the others.

28~01, issue040813export.pbn
Next Page

Comments

No comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
Latest News