Updated January 26 at 10:26am
opinion

Is it bad that the congressional “Supercommittee” failed to reach a budget agreement, thus triggering across-the-board cuts worth $1.2 trillion?

Posted:

Comments

2 comments on this story | Please log in to comment by clicking here
Please log in or register to add your comment
tedalmon@claflin.com

The question is improperly worded as those opposing cuts could vote either yes, assuming those cuts would have been greater or NO, as in failing to make cuts is good not bad.

Monday, November 28, 2011 | Report this
Mister_Smithers

The automatic cuts are OK, since the alternative would probably have been no cuts - or a spending increase - which would have triggered an immediate credit downgrade to the US from the big ratings agencies, followed by a stock market crash that would have led to layoffs and 401K evaporation like the world has never seen. Frankly, you should all thank the Tea Party for at least getting the US to think seriously about fed deficit reduction. It would not have happened without their influence, because Obama finds any type of cost cutting politically inconvenient considering his liberal (and vanishing) base of support. He's a one term president, if we are lucky.

Wednesday, November 30, 2011 | Report this
Latest News