Report asserts ‘tax flight is a myth’

THE CENTER ON BUDGET and Policy Priorities released a report on Thursday saying that the
THE CENTER ON BUDGET and Policy Priorities released a report on Thursday saying that the "tax flight" is a myth. /

WASHINGTON – “The effects of tax increases on migration are, at most, small – so small that states that raise income taxes on the most affluent households can be assured of a substantial net gain in revenue,” said a report by the Center of Budget and Policy Priorities.

“It would not be credible to argue that no one ever moves to a new state because of the desire to live someplace where taxes are lower. But neither is it credible to say that taxes are a primary motivation, nor that migration has a large impact on the revenue impact of tax measures,” said the report, entitled “Tax Flight Is a Myth.”

Beyond Cash Donations: How New Forms of Giving Are Transforming Not-for-Profit Accounting

Evolving Funding Landscape for Not-for-Profits Not-for-profit organizations are being asked to do more with less,…

Learn More

The report detailed the reasons behind its conclusion, including:

  • Migration is not common. Only about 30 percent of those born in the Untied States change their state of residence over the course of their entire lifetime, it said. The primary reasons for moving include: new jobs, cheaper housing, or a better climate.
  • People are more motivated to change states for cheaper housing rather than lower taxes. “The difference between housing costs in two different states is often many times greater than the difference in taxes.”
  • The report also asserted that “income tax increases cause little or no interstate migration,” citing a study in New Jersey that taxed filers with incomes exceeding $500,000.

    It found that, at most, 70 tax filers earning more than $500,000 might have left New Jersey between 2004 and 2007 because of the tax increase, costing the state $16.4 million in tax revenue.

    - Advertisement -

    The revenue gain from the tax increase over those years, however, was estimated at $3.77 billion, meaning that the out-migration reduced the estimate revenue gain from the tax increase by a “mere” 0.4 percent, it said.

  • Low taxes can prevent a state from maintaining the kinds of high-quality public services that potential migrants value such as cultural facilities, recreational opportunities, and good public services of which many are financed with tax dollars.

    The 22-page report criticizes “flawed” studies used to support the “tax flight myth” and explains the non-tax reasons why people move. To see the full report, click here.

  • No posts to display

    1 COMMENT

    1. The synopsis of this study seems to be focusing solely on whether tax increases will cause taxpayers to migrate away from a high tax environment. Perhaps a study should also focus on what we can do with our tax laws to attract high wealth and high income individuals and businesses to come to Rhode Island.