Was the R.I. Supreme Court right to side with Cranston in its dispute with retirees over pension adjustments?

THE R.I. SUPREME COURT affirmed a decision that upheld Cranston Mayor Allan W. Fung's pension reforms for public safety workers. The city had settled with most members of the pension plan, but a group of pension members opted out and continued litigation against the city. / PBN FILE PHOTO/MICHAEL SALERNO
THE R.I. SUPREME COURT affirmed a decision that upheld Cranston Mayor Allan W. Fung's pension reforms for public safety workers. The city had settled with most members of the pension plan, but a group of pension members opted out and continued litigation against the city. / PBN FILE PHOTO/MICHAEL SALERNO
Nearly three years after R.I. Superior Court ruled in favor of Cranston in its bid to sharply curtailed cost-of-living adjustments for police and firefighter retirees, the R.I. Supreme Court has upheld the lower court’s decision, letting the decade-long COLA freeze go forward. Did the justices make the correct decision?

Was the R.I. Supreme Court right to side with Cranston in its dispute with retirees over pension adjustments?

Want More Free?

To access 2 more articles, please log in or register for free.

Registered users get access to a limited number of free articles every month.

Register Now

Already registered? Login to access more free articles.

Purchase NowWant to share this story? Click Here to purchase a link that allows anyone to read it on any device whether or not they are a subscriber.

- Advertisement -