While the political insiders seem to have decided that it is time to tap into the aquifer in the Big River Management Area, we hope no action is taken before a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis is done, a water-usage regimen implemented, and a plan for spreading the cost of the water system devised.
Further, we need serious discussion about upgrading the aging infrastructure that treats and transports water and a clear-headed assessment of how to pay for that, as well.
The idea of tapping into the aquifer in West Greenwich in order to provide more water to residential, government and commercial consumers is the easy part – which is no doubt why a consensus has been reached. How about, just for a change, proactively doing the hard work of figuring out how to pay for it and how to better manage our resources – rather than leaving it for some future time of crisis.
The Coalition for Water Security, representing environmental advocates and those interested in sustainable development, continues to press for a more active water conservation plan.
Despite suburban sprawl and the pressure that a growing biotechnology sector puts on the state’s water supply, Rhode Island would have no problem meeting its needs were it not for the growing summer usage for lawn watering and car washing. The coalition has recommended surcharge fees for overusage, and we believe that such ideas are at least worth discussion.
And last – always last – but far from least, is the question of cost. The state owes itself – and its citizens – a clear-eyed look at how much a sufficient and properly maintained water supply system will cost, and who will pay for it.
•
